CO129-109 - Public Offices - 1865 — Page 39

for services rendered to H. M's Superintendency of hade

X. Consulur Establishment=

lut

in China; and that in the

Course

Б

1867

a

further

£

100 a

заах

Allowance

g assigned to

was fed him in respect

of Derinces rendered to H. M's Diplomatie & Consular Establishmere, in Japan

Ear Ampell has.

decided that this allowance

intocked

is to Vonvairate

into cover Not only did all not only

Men

pr his advice when but the cost of prosecutions required til for and or legal proceedings to cordent

WSmall Halls that

previously to that decision

it had

only

a alxed,

as

the

been considered

repune de from for

fonguing him

lows

advice

And that if it had been originally explained to

him in the sense in which it is now interpreted.

The circumstances of Hong

Kony

Zinder it not

empefitte

thul Imale could not

have acceper the 7.0.37 , as above interpreted,

Jetainer

without heavy cop. but this past of the question appears to be of no present importance as M Cardwell learns from your letter of the 24th. January that the arrangemens. with W&male is tohe

terminated

°C

With regard to

the particular question at issue it appears that fir Or. Alrock comployed W Smale to defend busin An action brought agamise him by a WMop Consegnence of

a in

C

maceedings taken by bein be his rapacity of Conane in Japan

de in

is disputed

Whether this source is tibe

considered as rendered to

the Foue ju Office

or to Sir R.

Alcast personally. Butiting